Stéphane Tailland
8db2bb6e39
Produced by k8s-platform/tools/generate-mcp-tools.py: deck file openapi2mcp does the conversion, and the wrapper re-injects the five things Kong's generator cannot emit — per-tool ACLs, the MCP behavioural annotations, the response schemas the plugin uses for structuredOutput, the real upstream host, and JSON-only request bodies. Each is a documented gap; see k8s-platform/MCP-TOOL-GENERATION.md. tools-policy.yaml carries the ACLs and doubles as the allow-list: an operation becomes a tool only if the policy names it. Kong would otherwise expose every operation in the spec, DELETE included, and can express no authorization at all from a bearer-token spec — silently, exit 0, no warning. Same tools as before, same ACLs. What changed: query parameters are now declared and callable, each tool carries its response schema so calls return structured content instead of raw JSON, and request bodies are no longer tripled across three identical content types. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
workforce-api
Kong routing/policy layer for the workforce slice of
classic-models-api (see /Users/stephanetailland/git/classic-models-api),
split out per the DDD decomposition in ../kong-konnect-deployment-strategy.md.
The backend stays a single monolith — only Kong does the domain split.
Structure mirrors ../sales-api/../payments-api — single MCP route from
the start, not ../catalog-api's original two-route pattern (see
../STATUS.md section 18).
Two resources, both with a REST surface and MCP tools:
Office(single keyofficecode) — full CRUD + anemployeessub-resource.Employee(single keyemployeenumber) — full CRUD +reports(direct reports, self-referential FK) andcustomers(assigned sales rep's customers) sub-resources.
| Route | Method | Backend path |
|---|---|---|
/workforce/v1/offices/ |
GET, POST | /classic-models/api/v1/offices/ |
/workforce/v1/offices/{officecode}/ |
GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE | /classic-models/api/v1/offices/{officecode}/ |
/workforce/v1/offices/{officecode}/employees/ |
GET | /classic-models/api/v1/offices/{officecode}/employees/ |
/workforce/v1/employees/ |
GET, POST | /classic-models/api/v1/employees/ |
/workforce/v1/employees/{employeenumber}/ |
GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE | /classic-models/api/v1/employees/{employeenumber}/ |
/workforce/v1/employees/{employeenumber}/reports/ |
GET | /classic-models/api/v1/employees/{employeenumber}/reports/ |
/workforce/v1/employees/{employeenumber}/customers/ |
GET | /classic-models/api/v1/employees/{employeenumber}/customers/ |
/workforce-mcp |
GET, POST, DELETE | MCP streamable-http |
Auth & MCP tool ACLs — the one domain where customer gets zero access
Both viewsets use ReferenceDataPermission
(authentication/permissions.py): read_only/product_manager/support
get read access, writes are admin-only, and — unlike every other
domain built this session — customer is not in the allow-list at
all, not even for reads. Verified directly against the permission
class, not assumed: this is genuinely internal staff/organizational data,
and the backend enforces that explicitly. All 7 read tools
(list-offices, get-office, get-office-employees, list-employees,
get-employee, get-employee-reports, get-employee-customers) have ACL
[admin, read_only, product_manager, support] — no customer. Both write
tools (create-office, create-employee) are admin only.
openid-connect on both surfaces (workforce-api REST audience,
mcp-workforce MCP audience), RFC 8693 exchange chain
MCP → workforce-api → classic-models-api. IdP: local Keycloak.
Structure
Same dev/ + kong/rest/ + kong/mcp/ layout as sales-api. Deploy key
and broker secret reused/mirrored from catalog-api and the live broker
client, same pattern as every domain since payments-api.