Stéphane Tailland 67a080ac3b refactor(mcp): generate the tool definitions from the spec
Produced by k8s-platform/tools/generate-mcp-tools.py: deck file openapi2mcp
does the conversion, and the wrapper re-injects the five things Kong's
generator cannot emit — per-tool ACLs, the MCP behavioural annotations, the
response schemas the plugin uses for structuredOutput, the real upstream host,
and JSON-only request bodies. Each is a documented gap; see
k8s-platform/MCP-TOOL-GENERATION.md.

tools-policy.yaml carries the ACLs and doubles as the allow-list: an operation
becomes a tool only if the policy names it. Kong would otherwise expose every
operation in the spec, DELETE included, and can express no authorization at all
from a bearer-token spec — silently, exit 0, no warning.

Same tools as before, same ACLs. What changed: query parameters are now
declared and callable, each tool carries its response schema so calls return
structured content instead of raw JSON, and request bodies are no longer
tripled across three identical content types.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 08:48:40 +02:00

payments-api

Kong routing/policy layer for the payments slice of classic-models-api (see /Users/stephanetailland/git/classic-models-api), split out per the DDD decomposition in ../kong-konnect-deployment-strategy.md. The backend itself stays a single monolith — only Kong does the domain split. Structure mirrors ../customers-api, not ../catalog-api — see ../STATUS.md section 18 for why (catalog-api's two-route MCP pattern has a latent bug; customers-api's single-route pattern is the corrected one to copy going forward).

Two exposure surfaces, both proxying to the real classic-models-api backend:

  • REST (kong/rest/) — 6 routes over Payment, which uses a composite key (customernumber + checknumber, not a single id like Customer/Product) — both URI segments are captured and passed through to the backend's own composite-key URL pattern.
  • MCP (kong/mcp/) — list-payments/get-payment (all 5 roles) and create-payment (admin only — verified against PaymentPermission's actual logic in authentication/permissions.py, not guessed: writes are admin-only in practice, customer can only write their own via the REST API directly, not exposed as an MCP tool). One KongRoute for all three MCP HTTP methods, one ai-mcp-proxy binding — see ../STATUS.md section 18 for why this matters (a second route + binding for the same plugin creates a duplicate-tool-name bug, found and fixed on customers-mcp, built correctly here from the start).
Route Method Backend path
/payments/v1/payments/ GET, POST /classic-models/api/v1/payments/
/payments/v1/payments/{customernumber}/{checknumber}/ GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE /classic-models/api/v1/payments/{customernumber}/{checknumber}/
/payments-mcp GET, POST, DELETE MCP streamable-http (tools call into the REST routes above)

Auth

openid-connect on both surfaces, distinct audience each (payments-api for REST, mcp-payments for MCP) with a real RFC 8693 exchange chain: MCP → payments-api → classic-models-api, same pattern as catalog-api/customers-api. IdP is the local Keycloak (https://keycloak.sttlab.local/realms/classic-models) — see ../STATUS.md sections 15/16. payments-api-audience and mcp-payments-audience client scopes + payments-api/mcp-payments resource clients created on the local Keycloak, attached to token-exchange-broker's default scopes (REST audience) and to librechat's optional scopes (MCP audience) respectively — no dedicated protocol mappers on either new client itself, same practice as every other domain built this session. mcp-payments's OAuth callback added to librechat's redirectUris, and a payments-mcp server entry added to LibreChat's librechat.yaml (infra-librechat repo).

Other policies

Per-consumer rate limiting, response caching (GET/HEAD), audit log (http-log, endpoint still a placeholder — no real log collector in this lab, same caveat as the other domains).

Structure

Same dev/ + kong/rest/ layout as customers-api. Deploy key (kong-v2/payments-api/git-deploy-key) is a copy of catalog-api's, not a freshly generated one — per the user's explicit instruction this session ("no reason a working key for catalog-api wouldn't work for customers-api"), the same reused key is used here too rather than minting yet another one per domain.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme 70 KiB