Files
classic-models-agent-flows/workflows/README.md
T
Stéphane Tailland 562987cd69 fix(workflow): reach the catalog, and answer
Two things were wrong, and the second hid the first.

n8n does not re-register an active workflow's definition on PATCH: the running
webhook kept executing the version it was activated with. So the corrected
subject_token expression was never running, and the Keycloak V1 NullPointer it
kept producing was the old empty-token failure — including through the attempt
to capture the request with an echo service, which the old definition never
called. Deactivate, apply, reactivate; written down in workflows/README.md
because it costs an afternoon otherwise.

The token reference itself: $json is the previous node's output, not the
request, so the subject token has to come from $('Webhook').

The regex is now loose after the underscore, so a reference that looks valid but
does not exist reaches the catalog instead of being answered with 'you named no
product', which was false.

Working for the main path and for a question naming no product. A nonexistent
code still returns an empty body — recorded as a known gap, not as acceptable.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 13:24:44 +02:00

64 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown

# Workflows
Exported as JSON and committed. The n8n instance is not the source of truth.
## Deploying a change
**n8n does not re-register an active workflow when you PATCH it.** The running
webhook keeps executing the definition it was activated with, so an edit appears
to have no effect — and the failure it keeps producing is the *old* one, which
is a very good way to spend an afternoon debugging something already fixed.
Deactivate, apply, reactivate, in that order:
```
POST /rest/workflows/<id>/deactivate {"versionId": "<current>"}
PATCH /rest/workflows/<id> {"nodes":…, "connections":…, "versionId": "<current>"}
POST /rest/workflows/<id>/activate {"versionId": "<current>"}
```
`versionId` changes at every step, so re-read it each time. And note
`PATCH {"active": true}` returns 200 and leaves the workflow inactive, silently:
activation has its own endpoint.
## approvisionnement-check-availability
Working. `POST /webhook/check-availability` with the end user's token in
`X-Subject-Token`:
```
"Peut-on promettre S10_1949 ?"
→ {"answer":"Yes — 1952 Alpine Renault 1300 (S10_1949) can be promised:
7305 in stock, above the reorder threshold of 50.","escalate":false}
"Peut-on promettre la Vespa ?"
→ {"answer":"No product reference in the question…","escalate":true}
```
It exchanges the token itself, using the agent's client secret from the pod
environment so the committed JSON holds no secret, then talks MCP in two calls:
`initialize` to obtain the session id from a **response header**, then
`tools/call`. No `notifications/initialized` is needed.
MCP rather than the REST route, which would have been one call instead of two:
the per-tool ACL by consumer group lives on the MCP route only. Going through
REST would give an autonomous agent broader access than a conversational one,
which is exactly backwards.
The product code is read with a regex, not a model. This agent's critical path
is rules; a question naming no product escalates rather than being guessed at.
The regex is loose after the underscore on purpose — a reference that looks
valid but does not exist must reach the catalog and come back as "no such
product", because answering "you named no product" would be false.
### Known gap
A product code that does not exist returns an **empty body** rather than that
message. The run completes, every node executes including the one that composes
the answer, and the response is still empty — so the fault is between the
composing node and the webhook response, not in the decision logic.
`alwaysOutputData` on the read node did not change it.
For an autonomous agent, silence is the worst possible answer. Not shipped as
acceptable — recorded as unfinished.