562987cd69
Two things were wrong, and the second hid the first.
n8n does not re-register an active workflow's definition on PATCH: the running
webhook kept executing the version it was activated with. So the corrected
subject_token expression was never running, and the Keycloak V1 NullPointer it
kept producing was the old empty-token failure — including through the attempt
to capture the request with an echo service, which the old definition never
called. Deactivate, apply, reactivate; written down in workflows/README.md
because it costs an afternoon otherwise.
The token reference itself: $json is the previous node's output, not the
request, so the subject token has to come from $('Webhook').
The regex is now loose after the underscore, so a reference that looks valid but
does not exist reaches the catalog instead of being answered with 'you named no
product', which was false.
Working for the main path and for a question naming no product. A nonexistent
code still returns an empty body — recorded as a known gap, not as acceptable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# Workflows
|
|
|
|
Exported as JSON and committed. The n8n instance is not the source of truth.
|
|
|
|
## Deploying a change
|
|
|
|
**n8n does not re-register an active workflow when you PATCH it.** The running
|
|
webhook keeps executing the definition it was activated with, so an edit appears
|
|
to have no effect — and the failure it keeps producing is the *old* one, which
|
|
is a very good way to spend an afternoon debugging something already fixed.
|
|
|
|
Deactivate, apply, reactivate, in that order:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /rest/workflows/<id>/deactivate {"versionId": "<current>"}
|
|
PATCH /rest/workflows/<id> {"nodes":…, "connections":…, "versionId": "<current>"}
|
|
POST /rest/workflows/<id>/activate {"versionId": "<current>"}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
`versionId` changes at every step, so re-read it each time. And note
|
|
`PATCH {"active": true}` returns 200 and leaves the workflow inactive, silently:
|
|
activation has its own endpoint.
|
|
|
|
## approvisionnement-check-availability
|
|
|
|
Working. `POST /webhook/check-availability` with the end user's token in
|
|
`X-Subject-Token`:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
"Peut-on promettre S10_1949 ?"
|
|
→ {"answer":"Yes — 1952 Alpine Renault 1300 (S10_1949) can be promised:
|
|
7305 in stock, above the reorder threshold of 50.","escalate":false}
|
|
|
|
"Peut-on promettre la Vespa ?"
|
|
→ {"answer":"No product reference in the question…","escalate":true}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
It exchanges the token itself, using the agent's client secret from the pod
|
|
environment so the committed JSON holds no secret, then talks MCP in two calls:
|
|
`initialize` to obtain the session id from a **response header**, then
|
|
`tools/call`. No `notifications/initialized` is needed.
|
|
|
|
MCP rather than the REST route, which would have been one call instead of two:
|
|
the per-tool ACL by consumer group lives on the MCP route only. Going through
|
|
REST would give an autonomous agent broader access than a conversational one,
|
|
which is exactly backwards.
|
|
|
|
The product code is read with a regex, not a model. This agent's critical path
|
|
is rules; a question naming no product escalates rather than being guessed at.
|
|
The regex is loose after the underscore on purpose — a reference that looks
|
|
valid but does not exist must reach the catalog and come back as "no such
|
|
product", because answering "you named no product" would be false.
|
|
|
|
### Known gap
|
|
|
|
A product code that does not exist returns an **empty body** rather than that
|
|
message. The run completes, every node executes including the one that composes
|
|
the answer, and the response is still empty — so the fault is between the
|
|
composing node and the webhook response, not in the decision logic.
|
|
`alwaysOutputData` on the read node did not change it.
|
|
|
|
For an autonomous agent, silence is the worst possible answer. Not shipped as
|
|
acceptable — recorded as unfinished.
|