18a8bf38a7
An earlier revision collapsed detection and ordering into one nightly run. They are not the same job: detecting a coming stock-out depends on something happening and should be woken by it, while proposing a purchase order is genuinely periodic — grouped by supplier lead time, not by unit sold. Recorded because it changes what has to be built: the autonomous mandate is a cost of choosing a clock, not of the business need. Kafka is the target for the reactive half. Nothing in the estate emits a domain event today, which is what made a nightly sweep look inevitable. Detection stays unbuilt until then rather than being approximated by a periodic scan — a batch pretending to be reactive is worse than an absent feature, because it looks finished. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
132 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
132 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
# Flows — the autonomous agents
|
|
|
|
**Runtime:** n8n · **Mode:** autonomous · Two agents in one repo.
|
|
|
|
| Agent | Client id | Trigger |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Approvisionnement | `classic-models-agent-approvisionnement` | event-driven, plus a periodic ordering run |
|
|
| Recouvrement | `classic-models-agent-recouvrement` | weekly, Monday |
|
|
|
|
They share a repo because they are not code: n8n workflow exports, same tool,
|
|
same owner. Splitting them would buy nothing.
|
|
|
|
## Why low-code for these two
|
|
|
|
Their work is rules, thresholds and due dates — a sequence of conditions and
|
|
calls, which a visual editor expresses better than code. The LLM is optional on
|
|
their critical path, which makes them cheaper and more predictable than the
|
|
conversational agents.
|
|
|
|
They remain full A2A agents: they publish an Agent Card, accept tasks, answer.
|
|
|
|
## Approvisionnement
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| MCP | catalog, sales |
|
|
| Scopes | `catalog:read`, `catalog:write`, `sales:read` |
|
|
|
|
Detect coming stock-outs, propose reorders — **two jobs with two different
|
|
triggers**, which an earlier revision of this file collapsed into one nightly
|
|
run.
|
|
|
|
*Detection is reactive.* It depends on something happening: an order placed, a
|
|
stock level crossing a threshold. Finding that out up to a day later is latency
|
|
chosen for nothing, and a nightly sweep re-reads the whole catalog to rediscover
|
|
what the domain already knew at the moment it changed.
|
|
|
|
*Proposing a purchase order is periodic.* Nobody reorders on every unit sold;
|
|
orders are grouped by supplier lead time and buying cycle. A clock is the right
|
|
trigger there, and that run is periodic on purpose rather than a batch standing
|
|
in for events.
|
|
|
|
Worth naming, because it changes what has to be built: **the autonomous mandate
|
|
is a cost of the trigger, not of the business need.** `offline_access`, a
|
|
refresh token stored encrypted and an exchange at trigger time are required only
|
|
because nobody is present at 3am. An agent woken by a domain event runs moments
|
|
after a human acted.
|
|
|
|
**Exposes** `check_availability` — called by Ventes before promising a delivery
|
|
date, and by Catalogue before discontinuing a reference. Returns a decision and a
|
|
date, never the stock table.
|
|
|
|
## Recouvrement
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| MCP | customers, payments |
|
|
| Scopes | `customers:read`, `payments:read`, `payments:write` |
|
|
|
|
Weekly: unpaid invoices past 30 days, dunning, escalation.
|
|
|
|
**Exposes** `check_creditworthiness` — called by Ventes before accepting a large
|
|
order.
|
|
|
|
**Dunning is prepared automatically and sent only after human validation.**
|
|
Sending a letter to a customer is an outward-facing action; a rule bug would
|
|
otherwise write to the entire customer base in one run.
|
|
|
|
## The A2A server gap
|
|
|
|
The available n8n community nodes ([n8n-nodes-a2a](https://github.com/agentic-layer/n8n-nodes-a2a),
|
|
[n8n-nodes-agent2agent](https://github.com/pjawz/n8n-nodes-agent2agent)) make n8n
|
|
an A2A **client**: `Discover Agent`, `Send Task`.
|
|
|
|
But both agents here must be **servers** — Ventes calls them. That needs an
|
|
Agent Card on `/.well-known/agent.json` and a JSON-RPC endpoint with the task
|
|
lifecycle. n8n webhooks can do it by hand, at which point it stops being no-code.
|
|
|
|
Preferred approach: **Kong in front of n8n**, exactly as it fronts every other
|
|
resource. Kong serves the Agent Card statically and routes JSON-RPC to the
|
|
webhook, and token verification lands where it already lives. No new component.
|
|
|
|
Alternative: a small FastA2A adapter, written once for both — see
|
|
`classic-models-agent-catalogue`, which uses FastA2A already.
|
|
|
|
## The autonomous mandate
|
|
|
|
No user session exists when these run, so authority must be pre-established: the
|
|
user obtains `offline_access` when creating the mandate, the refresh token is
|
|
stored encrypted, and the exchange happens at trigger time. `sub` stays the user
|
|
who mandated, `azp` says which agent acted.
|
|
|
|
The MCP servers see no difference between an autonomous and a conversational
|
|
call — same `sub`, same `azp`, same audiences. That is deliberate: downstream
|
|
policy must not need to know the trigger mode.
|
|
|
|
## Backlog
|
|
|
|
**Events over Kafka.** The target for the reactive half. The estate emits no
|
|
domain event today — `classic-models-api` has no signals, no outbound webhook,
|
|
and there is no bus in the cluster — so a workflow can only poll, which is what
|
|
made a nightly sweep look like the only option. Until Kafka is in place,
|
|
detection stays unbuilt rather than being approximated by a periodic scan: a
|
|
batch that pretends to be reactive is worse than an absent feature, because it
|
|
looks finished.
|
|
|
|
The periodic ordering run does not wait on this.
|
|
|
|
## Two controls that become mandatory here
|
|
|
|
They were deferrable with a human in the loop. They are not, once an agent
|
|
loops on its own.
|
|
|
|
- **Read volume caps per `(azp, sub)`**, enforced on Kong. An agent reads a
|
|
thousand records in seconds where a human clicks ten; a scope authorises the
|
|
read but says nothing about volume.
|
|
- **Authorisation on tool-call parameters**, not just the tool name. `write`
|
|
authorises writing, not "this €40k transfer".
|
|
|
|
An autonomous agent hitting a rule that requires approval must **fail cleanly
|
|
and escalate**, never decide. And any approval screen must be rendered from the
|
|
structured tool-call parameters — never from a sentence the model produced, or a
|
|
prompt injection writes what the human validates.
|
|
|
|
## Before writing workflows
|
|
|
|
Read `classic-models-agent-platform/CLAUDE.md` for the identity model, the
|
|
endpoints and the known blockers.
|
|
|
|
Deliverables in English. Export workflows as JSON and commit them; do not rely
|
|
on the n8n instance as the source of truth.
|