feat: consult Approvisionnement
One entry in the registry and a realm grant, which was the claim the design made about adding a specialist. Nothing in the graph changed. What the two specialists have in common, from the orchestrator's side, is nothing: one is PydanticAI over MCP, the other n8n workflows behind an adapter. It cannot tell them apart, which is what the protocol is for. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ spec:
|
||||
# gitea's own registry: the image sits beside the source it was built
|
||||
# from and inherits the repo's public visibility, so the pull needs no
|
||||
# credentials at all.
|
||||
image: gitea.sttlab.eu/stt/classic-models-agent-assistant:v0.1.0
|
||||
image: gitea.sttlab.eu/stt/classic-models-agent-assistant:v0.2.0
|
||||
ports:
|
||||
- name: http
|
||||
containerPort: 8080
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user