The ACL answers 'may this identity call create-product'. Nothing answered 'may
it call it with these arguments' — write authorises writing, not this
particular record. And the read cap counts calls, so one call asking for a
hundred thousand rows cost the same as one asking for ten.
The OPA plugin sends the decoded JSON-RPC body, so the decision point sees the
tool name and its arguments. The policy lives once in k8s-platform/opa and every
domain asks the same server.
Enforced at the gateway rather than in an agent, because an agent that has been
talked into something is the case this exists for.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A scope authorises a read and says nothing about volume. An agent reads a
thousand records in seconds where a person clicks ten, and until now nothing
noticed: the token is valid, the tool is permitted, the ACL passes. That gap
stopped being theoretical the day an autonomous run started reading the whole
catalog on a schedule.
identifier: credential keys the counter on the sub claim — the end user,
whoever is asking on their behalf — so an agent looping under one person's
identity spends that person's budget and cannot spend everyone's. Verified on
catalog: pm-user and ro-user hold separate counters.
Per-route namespace, so a busy domain cannot exhaust another's.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The response schemas added yesterday made every paginated list tool fail. The
plugin's fields are documented as OpenAPI format and validated with a JSON
Schema validator, and `nullable: true` is not a JSON Schema keyword — so it is
ignored, `type: string` is enforced, and `previous: null` on the first page is
rejected as *null is not of type "string"*.
The failure lands after the backend has already done the work, surfaces to the
caller as a bare tool retry exhaustion, and appears nowhere in the gateway's own
logs. Found only because an orchestrating agent asked a question that paged.
The generator now rewrites `nullable: true` into `type: [T, "null"]` wherever it
inlines a schema, request bodies included. A 3.1 spec needs none of this.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Produced by k8s-platform/tools/generate-mcp-tools.py: deck file openapi2mcp
does the conversion, and the wrapper re-injects the five things Kong's
generator cannot emit — per-tool ACLs, the MCP behavioural annotations, the
response schemas the plugin uses for structuredOutput, the real upstream host,
and JSON-only request bodies. Each is a documented gap; see
k8s-platform/MCP-TOOL-GENERATION.md.
tools-policy.yaml carries the ACLs and doubles as the allow-list: an operation
becomes a tool only if the policy names it. Kong would otherwise expose every
operation in the spec, DELETE included, and can express no authorization at all
from a bearer-token spec — silently, exit 0, no warning.
Same tools as before, same ACLs. What changed: query parameters are now
declared and callable, each tool carries its response schema so calls return
structured content instead of raw JSON, and request bodies are no longer
tripled across three identical content types.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
list-payments/get-payment (all 5 roles) and create-payment (admin
only — matches PaymentPermission's actual write-access logic, not
guessed). One KongRoute for GET/POST/DELETE, one ai-mcp-proxy
binding — avoids the duplicate-tool-name bug found and fixed on
customers-mcp (STATUS.md section 18), built correctly here instead
of repeating the two-route mistake.
Keycloak (local): mcp-payments-audience client scope + mcp-payments
resource client, attached to librechat as an optional scope, no
dedicated protocol mappers on the client itself.
6 routes over Payment, composite key (customernumber + checknumber),
proxying to classic-models-api. openid-connect with RFC 8693 token
exchange to classic-models-api audience, rate-limiting, proxy-cache,
audit-log — same structure as customers-api's REST layer.
Keycloak (local): payments-api-audience client scope + payments-api
resource client added, attached to kong-token-exchange-broker's
default scopes. No dedicated protocol mappers on payments-api
itself, same practice as customers-api/mcp-customers.
No MCP layer — same as customers-api, not needed yet.
Stéphane Tailland